Continuing Medical Education and Commercial Support

COLLEAGUES — I want to share with you some realities we face. For several years, TAFP has been able to offer you a great value in its CME – excellent quality at a very low cost – largely due to grant support from the pharmaceutical industry. Regarding this relationship, there are two issues of which I believe we all need to be aware. First, there continues to be a vocal component of our profession who believe commercially supported CME is tainted and biased. Second, there are major changes occurring in the way our pharmaceutical supporters are now providing educational grants, which has resulted in a dramatic reduction in the number of grants received by TAFP. These two issues lead us to a question we should consider: What would happen if CME stopped receiving commercial support entirely?

One of the scholars studying the relationship between CME and commercial support is R. Van Harrison, Ph.D., who attributes several factors to the increase of commercial CME support.

  • As the number of therapeutic options accelerated in the 90s, competition for product market share intensified creating a demand for more education on these new treatment options.

  • As academic medical centers and hospitals saw decreasing budgetary surpluses, they were forced to reduce their support for CME.

  • Managed care plans reduced and limited payments for services, as did Medicare and Medicaid, which meant physicians had less money to invest in continuing education.

Harrison points out some interesting aspects of the prosperity brought about as commercial support began satisfying those needs.

  • Since we are only told where the support comes from and not how much support is received for any CME activity, commercial support has hidden the true cost of CME from us.

  • Some of us view commercial support as “free money” and many of us believe we are entitled to it.

  • Medical associations and societies have become too dependent on commercial funding and its impact on the organization’s bottom line.

In his paper, Harrison offers a range of options for dealing with the relationship:

  • No change. Maintain the status quo.

  • Specialty organizations and perhaps Boards make curricular recommendations for topics.

  • Disclose the source and the amount of commercial support received.

  • Limit funding amounts by setting honorarium levels or limiting the maximum amount received per physician per day.

  • Commercial support would be a truly unrestricted educational grant and the CME provider would make all topic and program decisions.

  • Eliminate all commercial support.

Because of the changes in the way pharmaceutical companies provide support for CME, the first option is no longer viable. If we were to completely eliminate commercial support, our CME registration fees would increase dramatically. For example, without commercial support, registration fees for TAFP's Annual Session and Scientific Assembly would increase by as much as 800 percent. These are the challenges we face as we plan for the future of TAFP's educational offerings, but in the meantime you can be assured that our commitment to providing the highest quality of education possible has never been stronger.

Our Texas Academy is an accredited CME provider. With that privilege comes a special set of responsibilities to avoid bias and undue influence from commercial supporters. Our Academy is committed to bringing us CME that is fair, balanced, free of commercial bias and based on current clinical evidence. The rigid ACCME accreditation requirements that TAFP follows guarantee us high-quality, non-biased CME. Speaking with ACCME inspectors during our re-accreditation process during this month's Interim Session has convinced me that our Academy is complying  with the highest standards in the profession. We can thank our Executive Director Jim White, our Education Director Jo Ann Kindinger, their staffs, Dr. Dale Moquist and his Commission on Annual Session and CME for their commitment to providing outstanding educational programs. We can be proud and confident that we are fulfilling the highest standards of professional ethics.

Thank you for your continued membership. Please continue to share your thoughts, concerns and frustrations with me by e-mailing president@tafp.org.

Sincerely,

Tim Coleridge, D.O.
President