Bad medicine
A case study of medication error and neglect

By Texas Medical Liability Trust
Risk Management Department

The following closed claim study is based on an actual malpractice claim from Texas Medical Liability Trust. This case illustrates how action or inaction on the part of physicians led to allegations of professional liability, and how risk management techniques may have either prevented the outcome or increased the physician’s defensibility. An attempt has been made to make the material less easy to identify. If you recognize your own case, please be assured it is presented solely for the purpose of emphasizing the issues presented.

Clinical presentation
A 32-year-old female, heavy smoker, with a long history of migraines and respiratory difficulties presented to her family physician’s after hours clinic with complaints of severe headache, dehydration, fever and urinary infection. Past medical history reflects numerous workups, which failed to find the etiology of her severe onset of respiratory suppression.

Physician action
Her current condition was treated with Stadol, Rocephin and Decadron. Later that evening at home, the patient died of pulmonary emphysema. A toxicology report revealed the patient’s urine was positive for opiates and bloodstream found various substances including Dilaudid. Medical records did not indicate that the patient ever told the physician she took Dilaudid nor had the physician prescribed it.

Allegations

  • Negligently prescribed and administered drug to the patient and in such quantity that resulted in her death

  • Negligently failed to refer the patient to a specialist to adequately evaluate her condition

  • Negligently failed to admit the patient for further treatment and evaluation of her condition during the entire period of treatment

  • Abandoned the patient

  • Failed to communicate to other treating and evaluating physicians who had knowledge of the condition, the treatment, drugs prescribed and administered to the patient.

Legal principle
Negligence is defined as the failure to use ordinary care; that is, failure to do that which a health care provider of ordinary prudence would have done under the same or similar circumstances or doing that which a health care provider of ordinary prudence would not have done under the same or similar circumstances. Ordinary care means that degree of care that a health care provider of ordinary prudence would use under the same or similar circumstances.

Disposition
In this case treatment with Stadol was contraindicated for a patient with respiratory problems. Monetary value in this settlement was reduced since the patient never advised the physician she was taking Dilaudid, thereby contributing to her condition.

Risk management issues

  • At each visit ask the patient what medications they are taking and document them in the medical record.

  • Be familiar with pharmacodynamics of drugs prescribed, especially with the patient’s history in mind.

 

 All articles and any forms, checklists, guidelines and materials are for general information only, and should not be used or referred to as primary legal sources nor construed as establishing medical standards of care. They are intended as resources to be selectively used and always adapted—with the advice of the organization’s attorney—to meet state, local, individual organizations and department needs or requirements. This article is published with the understanding that Texas Medical Liability Trust is not engaged in rendering legal services. © 2001 TMLT. Reprinted with permission.