|
Online
health sites get poor marks
Study shows content is incomplete and difficult to read
By
Jonathan Nelson
|
|
Are
your patients among the estimated 100 million Americans logging on to
the Internet for health information? If so, a recent study published in
the Journal of the American Medical Association says they should consult
you before basing health care decisions on what they find. Information
posted on medical Web sites is often incomplete and difficult to read,
the report says.
While
the health information found was generally accurate, search engines
proved to be inefficient tools for locating relevant content and health
sites lacked key clinical elements identified by physicians. The problem
appears to be worse on Spanish-language sites. |
|
|
|
“Although
we found thousands of pages of material related to key questions, there
were substantial gaps in the availability of key information,” the
report says. About half of the topics expert panels deemed important were
given more than minimal coverage on English-language Web sites. “The
deficiency was particularly striking across Spanish-language sites where
more than half of the condition-related topics were not addressed,” the
report says.
Researchers
at the RAND Corporation, a Santa Monica, Calif., think tank, searched the
Web over a period of six months for information on four medical
conditions: breast cancer, childhood asthma, depression and obesity. Using
several popular search engines, they found that less than a quarter of the
first pages of links rendered by a search led to relevant content.
According to the report, more than half of Internet users report they
spend only about half an hour looking for health information. That
doesn’t leave a lot of time to sift through irrelevant material.
Researchers
employed panels of physicians to list clinical elements they thought would
be important to people looking for information on the four medical
conditions studied. For English-language sites, researchers found that
more than a quarter of the elements listed for childhood asthma were not
mentioned. More than a third of the elements listed for obesity were
absent. For Spanish-language sites, 69 percent of the elements for obesity
and 61 percent of the elements for depression were not discussed.
|
|
Some
specific examples of deficiencies are:
-
61 percent of
clinical elements relating to safety and effectiveness of dietary
supplements used for obesity were not covered on English sites. No
mention was found of these elements on Spanish sites.
-
Few sites
advised that a woman with a persistent breast mass and a negative
mammogram seek more testing.
-
Almost no
sites advised people with suicidal thoughts to see their doctor
-
Few
sites discussed the symptoms of an asthma attack.
|
|
The
study also showed that health information on the Internet requires a
high level of reading skill. English sites averaged a rating of grade
13.2 on the Fry Readability Graph, as they ranged from grade 10 to
graduate level. Spanish sites averaged grade 9.9. The study says that
according to a 1992 survey on adult literacy, nearly half of the U.S.
population has low or very low reading skills. Researchers concluded
that even if wider access to computers were available, today’s online
health information would be difficult for many to understand.
“If
people are relying on the Internet to make treatment decisions,
including whether to seek care, deficiencies in information could
negatively influence consumer decisions,” the report says. The report
was published in the May 23 edition of JAMA. |
|
|
|
Some sites
you might recommend to patients
Of the Internet
health sites RAND studied,
these scored highest:
www.Oncolink.com–a
breast cancer site by the University of Pennsylvania
www.nimh.nih.gov–a
depression site by the National Institutes of Health
AAFP is
encouraging physicians to direct patients battling high blood pressure to
a new page on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Web site.
Patients can find tips on diet and exercise, healthy recipes and other
information to help them control their condition. The address is: www.nhlbi.nih.gov/hbp/
The magazine, Family
Practice Management, recently published an article listing several
good health-related Web sites. Here are a few you or your patients might
find useful:
www.rxassist.org–site
sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation containing information
on the patient assistance programs for more than 100 pharmaceutical
manufacturers
www.noah-health.org,
www.drpen.com, and
www.familydoctor.org all
contain multilingual patient education information
www.immunize.com–provides
information on immunization and vaccination in 17 different languages.
|

|