|
By
Greg Herzog, TAFP legislative aide
|
|
The
77th Texas Legislative Session will be remembered as one of the most
divisive and partisan in recent history. Much of the tension can be
blamed on redistricting. Even though legislators couldn’t agree on a
final redistricting plan, this task and the political gerrymandering
surrounding it dictated the mood and events of the session.
As
new census data indicate, rapid growth along the Interstate 35 corridor
and the continued migratory trend toward urban areas across the state
could mean, in a post-redistricting session, a loss of as many as 15
rural House seats. Recognizing the probable loss of influence at the
Statehouse, the majority of which will be in areas west of IH-35, rural
legislators were determined to address the needs of rural Texas this
session.
Legislators
focused on the usual big-picture issues for rural areas—economic
development, transportation, and high-speed telecommunications
infrastructure—but health care topped the list. Many officials have
witnessed hospital closings and other effects caused by the 1997
Balanced Budget Act and they understood that access to quality health
care is as important to rural community development as roads or new
businesses. These legislators backed their words with action, passing
several bills and appropriating funds to address the health care
concerns of rural Texas. |
|
|
|
Putting the
money where their mouths are
It’s
unclear whether legislators are big music fans, but if they heard any song
this session, it was the beating drums from rural and border physicians
regarding low Medicaid reimbursement rates. Organized medicine beat the
drum and legislators began moving to the rhythm.
Though
already mentioned, it bears repeating that health providers should see
rate increases from the $197 million allocated in Senate Bill 1, the
general appropriations bill. To improve recruitment and retention of rural
and border physicians, the appropriations act specifically targets primary
care providers who practice in those areas as the chief beneficiaries of
these rate increases. A methodology will be developed to provide a
“bonus” payment for high volume Medicaid providers. The funds
allocated for physicians and providers will be targeted toward Early
Periodic Screening Diagnosis and Treatment program and selected primary
care codes with the goal of promoting preventive care.
This
appropriation has been a long time coming and it’s a giant step toward
supporting the sagging physician infrastructure in rural areas.
Legislators, both urban and rural, heard the music and they responded.
|
|
The rural
7-11 or a big whale
The convenience
store has become a staple of our society for no other reason than it
provides one-stop shopping for basic goods. Rural legislators, including
Speaker Pete Laney, D-Hale Center, and Rep. Warren Chisum, R-Pampa,
recognized the value of such a strategy for rural Texas and as a result
they drafted House Bill 7. This legislation creates a new one-stop state
agency for rural communities, the Office of Rural and Community Affairs.
ORCA, no not
the big whale, includes something for everyone in rural Texas, and it
packs a punch—$80 million in federal community development block grants.
This money can be used for a variety of rural community development
projects, like health care, transportation, economic development,
telecommunications and education. The Center for Rural Health Initiatives
is scheduled to be absorbed by ORCA as it becomes fully operational over
the next two years. The new office will preserve programs now administered
by CRHI. Unfortunately, a line item veto by Gov. Rick Perry reduced
start-up funding for ORCA by $1 million.
|
|
|
|
Now, the rest of the story
The 77th
Texas Legislature may be remembered as partisan, but it will also be
remembered as far-sighted in terms of addressing access to quality
health care in rural and underserved areas. Several bills were passed
this session designed to recruit and retain physicians and other health
care professionals, as well as to provide needed physician relief
services.
One colorful
rural representative, who recognized that most rural physicians were
either raised in the country or they married someone who was, believed
that “what Texas needed to address the rural physician shortage is a
dating service.” The Legislature stopped short of passing this
legislation, but the following is an overview of the bills that did pass
and have been signed by the governor. |
|
HB
2421 (Rep. Hawley, D-Portland/ Sen. Madla, D-San Antonio) creates a
pilot program to create a competitive grant to a Texas medical school to
prepare more students for rural medical practice. This TAFP-supported
legislation will partner CRHI/ORCA with a participating medical school to
identify potential applicants, sponsor financial aid and mentor rural high
school students who are interested in practicing medicine. Additionally, a
rural elective curriculum will be developed by a medical school to
encourage those students to return to a rural area.
SB
940 (Sen. Bivins, R-Amarillo) establishes the Joint Admission Medical
Program to increase minority medical school enrollment. This program will
create an internship for qualified undergraduate students in hopes the
experience will encourage them to pursue careers in medicine. In an effort
to have more representative medical school enrollment, both geographically
and demographically, the bill requires medical schools to reserve 10
percent of student slots for economically disadvantaged students. Students
will be placed under a contract in order to receive financial assistance.
This contract will require them to maintain a certain grade point average
and complete the courses or repay the loans.
HB
1018 (Rep. Hardcastle, R-Vernon/Sen. Haywood, R-Wichita Falls)
requires the State Board of Medical Examiners to expedite the applications
for medical licensure for those individuals who express their intention to
practice in rural areas.
SB
126 (Sen. Madla/ Rep. Turner, D-Voss) creates a $5 million endowment
for a loan repayment program for licensed health professionals other than
physicians, who contract to serve in rural areas. It will be based on the
existing, and very successful, physician loan repayment program.
Legislators have recognized that not only is it difficult to recruit
physicians to rural areas, it’s also difficult to recruit nurses,
pharmacists, radiological technologists and others.
SB
115 (Sen. Madla/Rep. Hawley) creates a rural foundation (5.01 c.3)
within the CRHI to assist rural communities and health professionals raise
money for local projects. The new foundation will provide grant writing
assistance for funds available through governmental entities, foundations
and other sources to fund local rural health projects.
SB
1394 (Sen. Fraser, R-Horseshoe Bay/Rep. Hawley) is authorizing
legislation for the TAFP-supported Rural Community Health Systems, which
was created by the Legislature in 1997. This bill allows the RCHS to
create a pilot project to determine the effectiveness of exclusive
provider networks in the delivery of rural Medicaid.
|
|
The one that
got away
SB 516 (Rep.
Hawley/Sen. Madla) Perry struck down the Physician Relief Services Act
late on the last day for the governor to sign or veto legislation. SB 516
would have created a locum tenens program administered through CRHI/ORCA.
Over the last decade, similar legislation has been introduced on no less
than three separate occasions and this legislation was developed through
an interim study charged by the previous legislature.
The program
would have allowed CRHI/ORCA to recruit and coordinate relief services for
practicing rural primary care physicians at an affordable rate. A
provision of the bill authorized the use of fully licensed third-year
residents as relieving physicians in hopes the program would increase
their exposure to rural medicine.
Clearly, TAFP
is disappointed that Perry chose to veto this important rural health
legislation. TAFP believes that the lack of available physician relief
services is a real-life problem facing physicians and thus patients in
rural areas. This legislation would have provided services to rural
physicians and patients and helped increase exposure to the physicians of
tomorrow. TAFP will continue to work with the CRHI/ORCA and other
stakeholders toward these important goals.
|
|

|