|
|
|
Prescription
for Change:
New prescribing rules,
liability insurance plus other interim issues
by Tom Banning,
TAFP Director of Legislative Affairs
|
|
The ways in
which prescriptions are written and dispensed in Texas are about to change
dramatically as of June 1, 2002. Late
in the legislative session the large retail pharmacy chains, led by H.E.B.
added an amendment to Senate Bill 768 that repeals the two-line
prescription form and gives a pharmacist the ability to substitute a
generic drug unless the prescriber clearly indicates, in his or her own
hand writing that the brand is “medically necessary.” The bill was
originally filed as a “clean up” bill to address emergency kits.
The
amendment was offered without benefit of a hearing in either chamber of
the Legislature or any consideration to physicians or other health care
professionals. It was never
filed as legislation or vetted among affected professionals. A
House/Senate conference committee was appointed and amendments were made
to clarify that a pharmacist has the legal responsibility to dispense as
directed by the practitioner and required the Texas State Board of
Pharmacy to garner input on rulemaking from regulatory boards for
prescribing stakeholders.
|
Sign
Up to be a Legislative Key Contact!
Contact
your State Representative
and
Senator
Read
the Legislative Update from the last issue |
|
Steve Morse,
director of professional services for the Texas State Board of Pharmacy,
says the new rule was put in place to resolve a reimbursement issue
pharmacists experienced when filling Medicaid prescriptions. In cases
where a generic equivalent is available, Medicaid will only pay for the
generic drug unless the pharmacist can show proof that the physician
wrote “brand necessary” or “brand medically necessary” on the
prescription in his or her own hand.
“Pharmacists
were following those substitution instructions [on the two-line
prescription form] and then getting dinged when they were audited by
Medicaid, so the move was to make this uniform,” Morse says.
The rule will
require physicians to write by hand the phrase “brand medically
necessary” or “brand necessary” on every prescription for which
the physician wishes the brand-name medication dispensed if a generic is
available, whether or not the script is for a Medicaid patient. Signing
under the “dispense as written” line will no longer legally require
the pharmacist to dispense that drug.
“When
they phone it in, all that a physician or the physician’s designated
agent will have to do is say, ‘we need to dispense this brand, brand
necessary,’” Morse says, “and if it is indeed a Medicaid patient,
the physician will have to follow up with a written prescription, either
sent or faxed to the pharmacy, with ‘brand necessary’ across the
face of it.”
For electronic prescriptions,
physicians will be required to include the phrase “brand medically
necessary” or “brand necessary” to have the brand medication
dispensed. Physicians will have to follow with faxed or mailed
prescriptions bearing the required phrase if they wish to bar generic
substitution for Medicaid scripts sent electronically. |
|
Contact
the TAFP Legislative Department:
Tom
Banning, Director of Legislative Affairs
Greg
Herzog,
Legislative Aide
Visit
the Member Advocacy section of the Web Site |
Medical
Liability
If you
haven’t renewed your medical liability this year, get ready for some
sticker shock. Physicians across Texas are reporting premium increases
from 30 to 300 percent.
After several
years of relative stability, medical liability insurers in most—though
not all—major markets across the country are reporting sharp increases
in loss adjustment expense and loss ratios. Industry analysts warned well
in advance of the current economic downturn and long before the terrorist
attacks on Sept. 11 that premiums were inadequate to cover losses and that
the market was transitioning from a “soft” market with too many
competitors to a “hard” market where marginal carriers consolidate or
leave a market.
Insurers have
countered the hemorrhaging of their bottom lines with double and triple
digit premium increases, reducing policy limits, increasing deductibles,
refusing to renew some classes of risk and abandoning the market
altogether. They are pricing insurance beyond affordability for some
practices, and calling for tort reform.
The
consequences of this instability are devastating to both doctors and
patients. Physicians are confronted with a choice of unaffordable or
unavailable coverage, while being squeezed by mounting pressure from
hospitals and managed care organizations to maintain or increase their
policy limits. Economically fragile practices or more litigious venues are
reporting the exodus of specialists, inability to recruit physicians,
early retirement, and difficulty maintaining ER or code coverage. Physicians almost uniformly report increasing defensive
practices and dropping high-risk classes of patients and/or high-risk
procedures.
|
|
TAFP has begun discussions with
state and local officials regarding solutions.
The next iteration of this debate, which will be initiated by Texas
House and Senate interim committee studies and public hearings, will focus
on three related problems:
-
adequacy of
tort law, legal professional discipline and judicial enforcement of
current statutes;
-
adequacy of
state oversight of underwriting and reserve practices of liability
carriers; and
-
adequacy of
patient safety measures and medical professional discipline.
Part of our
charge is to accurately document the extent of the lawsuit abuse problem
and the degree to which the problem has compromised access to care and
increased the cost of medical care. We
need your help. Please provide TAFP staff with any stories or problems
you’ve had with abusive or frivolous lawsuits, any services you’ve
stopped performing, the amount of increase in your liability coverage
premiums, or any practice changes you’ve had to make or will make unless
something is done to address this problem.
Please send any information to:
Texas
Academy of Family Physicians,
attn: Tom Banning,
6034 West Courtyard Drive, Suite 140, Austin, Texas 78730
or tbanning@tafp.org
|
| |
TAFPPAC
The TAFP
Political Action Committee (TAFPPAC) is excited to announce the launch
of a new Web site which will provide TAFP members with the latest in
political news, who’s running for office and which candidates
TAFPPAC has endorsed. The
Web site will also provide interesting links to other sites and the
ability to contribute to TAFPPAC online.
TAFPPAC
speaks on behalf of more than 5,500 family physicians and their
patients through grassroots involvement, personal relationships with
elected officials and political campaign participation and
contributions. TAFPPAC is
a non-partisan political action committee that supports candidates who
demonstrate support for issues important to family physicians and
their patients.
Through the
2002 election cycle and the 78th Legislative session, TAFPPAC will
work to:
-
assure
fair managed care practices--prompt payment of claims,
standardization of forms and contracts, further refinement of
state antitrust laws to permit physician communications and
negotiations, and due process in credentialing matters;
-
assure
fair malpractice insurance practices, tough sanctions for lawsuit
abuse and tighter screening of claims brought against physician
defendants;
-
restore
and preserve Medicaid funding;
-
restore
and preserve funding to public health systems, with emphasis on
childhood immunizations and bioterrorism preparations; and
-
oppose
taxing medical practices or other forms of economic restraint that
exacerbate an already fragile medical practice environment.
|
|
Medicaid
Acting on
recommendations submitted by the Physician Payment Advisory Committee
(PPAC), the Texas Health and Human Services Commission implemented
additional increases for physicians and other practitioners
participating in the Medicaid program. Medicaid fee increases were a
top priority for the academy during the 2001 session of the Texas
Legislature.
The first
increase is for CPT code 99213, which will rise from $27.28 to $29.52,
an 8.2 percent increase. The second increase is targeted to
“high-volume” Medicaid practitioners. A “high-volume”
practitioner will be defined as a primary care physician who averages
at least 300 Medicaid patient encounters per month, or a specialty
care physician who provides the top 50 percent of services within his
or her individual specialty. Fee increases will be implemented
statewide in both the traditional Medicaid and Medicaid managed care
service areas.
On average,
“high volume” specialists will receive a 6.1-percent payment
increase, while “high volume” primary care physicians will receive
a 1.9-percent increase. The PPAC recommended giving “high volume”
specialty physicians a larger percentage increase since primary care
physicians principally will benefit from the increase in CPT code
99213 as well as increases previously enacted last year.
The newest
recommendations build on a fee increase enacted Sept. 1, 2001, that
raised the fees for Texas Health Steps (EPSDT) medical screening exams
from $49 to $70. All of the fee updates were ordered by the last
session of the Legislature, which directed the state Medicaid program
to increase payments for Medicaid professional services by $50 million
over the 2002-03 biennium. The Legislature directed the Medicaid
program to use the new monies to improve primary care services and
also to reward the vital “high-volume” practitioners along the
Texas-Mexico border, in inner-city communities and in rural counties.
|
|
|